Surrey City Centre Library / Bing Thom Architects


© Ema Peter

© Ema Peter


© Ema Peter


© Ema Peter


© Ema Peter


© Ema Peter

  • Budget: $26.5 million

© Ema Peter

© Ema Peter

Ground Floor Plan

Ground Floor Plan

From the architect. The LEED® Gold Certified Surrey City Centre Library marks the next phase of a major civic investment in the transformation of downtown Surrey. With advances in easily available electronic information, the role of libraries is changing and the book collection is no longer the central focus.


© Ema Peter

© Ema Peter

Sections

Sections

The building design evolved out of the need to provide a space for reading, studying, and above all, gathering as a community. The library features large windows, a welcoming entrance with clear sight lines that allow visitors to quickly orient themselves in the space, and an upward winding central atrium and two skylights that allow natural light into the building. Utilizing state of the art computer modeling software, BTA was able to ensure that the concrete formwork was highly efficient and easy to construct. The exterior concrete structure was carefully detailed as the final surface, thereby eliminating the need for expensive building cladding.


© Ema Peter

© Ema Peter

The outward sloped walls also provide solar shading. Together with the Surrey librarians, BTA developed a social media strategy using blogs, Facebook, Twitter and Flickr to engage the community in the design of the building, encouraging the public to post comments and photos, thereby making the City Centre Library arguably the first public building in the world to be designed with the aid of social media.

http://ift.tt/1UfQfe4

ArchDaily Interviews the Curators of the Golden Lion Awarded Spanish Pavilion at the 2016 Venice Biennale

In an exclusive interview with ArchDaily, the curators of this year’s Spanish Pavilion at the 2016 Venice Biennale, Iñaqui Carnicero and Carlos Quintáns, discuss their reasoning and intentions for the Golden Lion awarded national pavilion’s design. Titled “Unfinished,” Quintáns describes the project’s influence as “the detection of reality that we show only through photography, of what happened (in Spain) after the housing bubble, first the real estate boom and then the crisis, and how we can offer solutions thanks to the many talented architects of the many projects which have been realized in Spain and have been partially obscured.” The pavilion answers Director Alejandro Aravena’s call for national pavilions that identify domestic responses to architectural dilemmas that could be the solutions for other places facing similar issues.

To see the video with subtitles, make sure that the “CC” button is selected.

The 55 selected projects on view in Venice demonstrate what the curators refer to as “a chain initiated by other architects in the past and by existing constructions. And they are able, with only a series of minimal resources, to reactivate, to reuse building that up until now had been abandoned.” The exhibition itself employs some of the same elements of minimal intervention and resourcefulness characterized by the projects being featured, with simple construction elements being used in highly versatile ways.

This video is part of an exclusive partnership between ArchDaily and the Spanish photographer Jesús Granada. Granada’s stock images of the Biennale can be obtained on his website, here. ArchDaily’s complete coverage of the 2016 Biennale can be found, here; with coverage focused on the Spanish Pavilion, here.

Spain’s “Unfinished” – Winner of the Golden Lion at the 2016 Venice Biennale
//cdn.embedly.com/widgets/platform.js

http://ift.tt/25Mr7mC

Anura Vineyards / MBA Architects + Inhouse Brand Architects


© Riaan West Photography

© Riaan West Photography


© Riaan West Photography


© Riaan West Photography


© Riaan West Photography


© Riaan West Photography


© Riaan West Photography

© Riaan West Photography

Plan

Plan

Anura Vineyards, a breathtaking South African wine farm situated in the Cape Winelands, has revealed spankingly modern interiors for its new events venue. Nestled between the towns of Paarl and Stellenbosch, this venue provides more than just idyllic surroundings and award-winning wines – it offers a contemporary design direction in a landscape usually associated with traditional architecture…

Having already created the heady contemporary space for the wine farm’s restaurant and brewery, Wagon Trail, it was unsurprising that Inhouse Brand Architects was commissioned to design the new building’s interiors. Inhouse was directed by the client to connect the style of the existing restaurant with that of the events space. 


© Riaan West Photography

© Riaan West Photography

Set to host a wide range of functions such as weddings, launches and conferences, it was essential that a stylish and inclusive aesthetic was chosen, forming a neutral backdrop for any function. Creative director, Aidan Hart, and senior designer, Brenda Hart (both of whom had previously headed the Wagon Trail project), opted for neutral colours to contrast the venue’s high ceilings already clad by the client in solid Oregon pine. Light-colour porcelain tiles were selected for the flooring, along with a weathered-plaster paint finish, to complement the warm wooden hues and establish a distinctly modern space that hints at a conventional farmhouse. Floor-to-ceiling glass windows perfectly frame the outdoor vistas, further strengthening the contemporary feel while incorporating the best use of natural light. 


Elevation

Elevation

The choice of lighting was a challenge because it needed to suit a variety of different events. Steering away from the traditional, Inhouse commissioned local industrial designer, Ryan Matchett, to create a series of modish, steel pendant feature lights. These are suspended over the entire venue, providing well-balanced light throughout. 

The bathrooms encompass the modern-rustic aesthetic that is already evident in the space. Brass pendant lights and taps, as well as angled mirrors, produce a countrified look-and-feel. This is cleverly juxtaposed with black mosaic-wall tiles, which contribute to a more contemporary appearance. Wood tiling in the bathrooms was used, offering practicality and warmth. 


© Riaan West Photography

© Riaan West Photography

Adjoined to the main venue is the beautifully conceived Cooper’s Bar. Inspired by the craft of barrel-making, as the name suggests, the interior conveys a sense of the wine farm’s heritage. Representing a cooper’s yard, dozens of refurbished barrels hang from the ceiling and pay tribute to this unique craft. 

To reinforce the concept, wooden panels imitating deconstructed wine barrels were used to clad the bar, while metal hoop lights were suspended overhead. A solid piece of Oregon pine forms the bar counter, accompanied by bar stools fashioned from steel and wood. Wood is unquestionably the central element of the design – casing practically everything in the room. Rusted metal sheets cover the back of the bar, adding to the rustic feel.


© Riaan West Photography

© Riaan West Photography

In addition to this, old piping was repurposed as leg stands for the high tables that occupy the space. A notable design feature includes black, high-gloss porcelain tiling which has been laid alongside porcelain wooden tiles in a herringbone pattern. By mixing these opposing materials, Inhouse was able to produce an uber-chic yet relaxed environment.  

Anura Vineyard’s new events venue showcases how an upmarket, contemporary aesthetic can still stay true to wine farm culture and traditions. 


© Riaan West Photography

© Riaan West Photography

http://ift.tt/1UAB3nE

LifeObject: Inside Israel’s Pavilion at the 2016 Venice Biennale


© Laurian Ghinitoiu

© Laurian Ghinitoiu

As part of ArchDaily’s coverage of the 2016 Venice Biennale, we are presenting a series of articles written by the curators of the exhibitions and installations on show. Here, Arielle Blonder, one of the curators (along with Dr. Ido Bachelet, Bnaya Bauer, Dr. Yael Eylat Van-Essen and Noy Lazarovich) of the Israeli Pavilion, gives us an insight into one of the exhibited works in the pavilion: LifeObject, “a freestanding structure inspired by a 3D scan of a bird’s nest.” The essay was originally published in LifeObject: Merging Biology and Architecture.

A matter of resilience: LifeObject is an architectural installation, which transposes the resilient properties of a bird’s nest, through scientific analysis, into a spatial form rich with new architectural perspectives. At the core of the installation are free-form volumetric airy surfaces undulating in space that are composed out of over 1500 slender and light components, inspired by twigs; relying on tension only, they form a light-weight, porous and resilient structure. The LifeObject combines smart, composite and biological materials in the formation of a ‘living structure’ that responds to its environment. Human presence around it triggers the opening of ‘cabinet de curiosités’, revealing a variety of innovative biological elements to visitors.

The LifeObject materializes a series of abstract ideas, preoccupations and potentials in present and future architectural field. The concepts proposed by the structure sketch alternative formal and structural languages informed by external disciplines. It hints at future applications and integration of biologically inspired materials that originate from various settings, scales and orientation.


© Dacian Groza

© Dacian Groza

Starting from the study of a biological structure, The LifeObject spans across all levels of animation, from the bio-inspired design of inanimate material, through dynamic inorganic material, to living material itself. The LifeObject binds materials, technologies and alternative modes of design and fabrication in the creation of a complex system.  


© Laurian Ghinitoiu

© Laurian Ghinitoiu

New Materiality

The meaning of complexity in architecture has changed considerably in the past few decades, and in tandem, so has the manner with which we approach and treat complexity; the focus has shifted from visual formalism to a material perception of the world that deals with pragmatism, mechanisms of performance and processes of morphogenesis. This new position towards matter[1] serves as the backdrop for the LifeObject. It is tightly linked to the introduction of digital media into architecture in the mid-1990s, placing fabrication and generative design processes as core concepts of the architectural discourse. Computation, alongside concerns of sustainability, replaced compositions and semantics with matter and performance. New practices of material-making[2] that blur the boundaries between processes of digital fabrication, bring closer together design, fabrication and material research to take a central position in the architect’s work today[3]. The revisited approach to craftsmanship, especially as relates to new possibilities engendered by the development of digital fabrication as digital craft, adds another dimension to these new architectural preoccupations[4].

These new areas of architectural interest are not merely perceived as the expansion of his palette of expression, but rather as the contemporary understanding of his duty and professional responsibility[5]. As such, materials’ properties and their modes of transformation become motors of design, integrated as experimental research in material and fabrication; the architect now plays an active role in the development of materials and their making. 


© Laurian Ghinitoiu

© Laurian Ghinitoiu

[LifeObject] New matter

As an experiment of material research, The LifeObject evolved from the biomimetic study of a bird’s nest into a new material system[6].  Depending on its framing, the installation can be understood either as matter, as a structure or as system. We manipulated fiber-composite material to make components that are assembled into a structure, which in turn, when seen as a whole, can be regarded as a porous structural substance that makes free-form volumes in space. Extremely light, comprised of a multitude of similar but varied components of low material density, it creates a stable yet flexible, resilient volumetric matter. In a process of learning through the material, rather than by a parametric control over it to achieve performance, matter becomes a generative force[7] that informs the design and its construction processes, as modes of material making. Rather than integrating biological principles within a mechanical framework, as a typical biomimetic process, we wish to embrace biological values across all levels, not only in its design but also in the design process and construction method. Abandoning deterministic control for an open-ended fabrication and construction process that is attentive to the qualities of this new matter-structure is the essential shift we have made towards the adoption of the biological paradigm within architecture.


© Laurian Ghinitoiu

© Laurian Ghinitoiu

[LifeObject] A matter of biology

This new materiality that we are presenting with The LifeObject is the product of dialogue between architecture and biology. A possible approach to portrait it is through common biological characteristics, suggesting that we can read The LifeObject as a biological material and a living organism. 


© Dacian Groza

© Dacian Groza

The richness of natural materials and living organisms can be characterized by several common traits[8], which by and large stand in contrast to the mechanically engineered world; bottom up processes of growth contrast top-down traditional design approaches, multifunctionality diverges from optimized efficiency and the biological adaptive qualities can be seen as the absolute opposite of planning and control. These deep concepts of design and operation constitute the core of living materials and indicate the biological qualities of The LifeObject.  It is structured as a hierarchical material*, building up from the fiber, through the knit surface, to the overall spatial aggregation that makes up the volumetric porous elements. A strong interrelation between all hierarchical levels directly affects the overall performance of the material. The fundamental natural process of self-organization* is reflected on several levels of hierarchy, implemented through processes of design, fabrication and assembly.  The knit material finds it form by gravity to make the components, which in turn are assembled following a design code that combines randomness with preset values; these derive from the algorithmic analysis of the nest. Just as the distinct form of the bird’s nest emerges from the random arrangement of twigs under mutual bending stresses, the overall form of the LifeObject is achieved by the adaptivity* of its structure. Its free-form shape results from the mutual bending forces of its components, pressed between floor and ceiling. On the component level, its morphology is the outcome of its adaption to gravity forces and boundary conditions. The mold-free fabrication process through which the components were made exemplifies low-energy synthesis*, echoed in the joint-free construction process.  As a multifunctionalmaterial, it combines structure with the functional elements of the ‘breathing cells’, into an integral system.

Taking “the indifference to one’s surrounding”[9] as the distinctive element between the living and the non-living, as a kind of re-visited vitalism, opens-up the possibility of regarding The LifeObject with its integrated breathing cells, as a living system. Concepts such as movement, feedback and intelligence that distinguish the living from the inanimate, demonstrate The LifeObject‘s hybrid nature. It comes to life providing a kind of feedback* to human presence, activating both structure and space. ‘Pores’ in the structure open up to reveal biological wonders, and translucent glass surfaces in space change opacity to expose the outdoor natural setting. The opening of the ‘pores’ is facilitated by stripes of shape-memory material that form a moving screen. Programmed changes in molecular organization of the material create a non-mechanical movement*. The dynamic behavior of shape-memory materials acts as a material embedded motor, as a kind of material intelligence. The potential future integration of biological materials within the system, insinuated by the living matter displayed within the ‘pores’, bears the promise of a enhanced material intelligence, which merges architectural materiality with the biological one.


© Laurian Ghinitoiu

© Laurian Ghinitoiu

[LifeObject] A matter of resilience

The different characteristics of TheLifeObject, reflected in its design, fabrication and behavior, relate it to living systems and biological materials. Standing in contrast to the architectural-mechanical paradigm, it is the system’s natural properties that make-up its resilient nature.

In the same way that the redundancy of twigs in the bird’s nest builds its resistance, the multitude of light and weak elements that compose The LifeObject enhance its robustness. The final stability of the structure is reached by the multiple interactions between the elements as points of friction, contributing to its overall resilient nature.

“Diverse at its edge, while simple at its core”[10], it is the slight variation within the wide array of similar yet individual components that ensures the resistance of the structure to failure. Its design and construction, that combines the pre-determined and the emergent, makes it insensitive to local errors and minor deficiencies.

The bird’s nest, as an iconic natural model of a home, was intentionally chosen for the longtime interest this structure has raised amongst architects and engineers in various perspectives, from the Beijing 2008 stadium of Herzog and De Meuron, to its CT scanning and computation as part of the Emergent Technologies and Design program[11]. For us, the starting point for the questioning of relationships between the artificial and the natural in the future built environment had to be the home. From there, through an experimental process of algorithmic analysis, coding, material research, alternative fabrication and design, The LifeObject has evolved to become a new matter of resilience.

[1] See the elaboration of these terminologies in the phrasebook terms intecalated in the following LifeObject section. For a more elaborate discussion on the philosophical aspects of the new approach to materiality see opening text by Y.Eylat Van-Essen  “LifeObject, Merging Biology and Architecture”

[2] A leading example of bio-inspired material making by digital fabrication tools of rapid prototyping is the work of Neri Oxman with Variable Properties Rapid Prototyping (VPRP). See for example Neri Oxman, “Variable Property Rapid Prototyping.” Virtual and Physical Prototyping 6, no. 1 (March 1, 2011): 3–31.

[3] For a review of different approaches to material based computational design see Rivka Oxman, “Informed Tectonics in Material-Based Design.” Design Studies 33, no. 5 (September 2012): 427–55.

[4] See for example architectural explorations of digital fabrication in the works of Marc Fornes at http://ift.tt/231IokV, Andrew Kudless at http://ift.tt/Rtcbyx and Lisa Iwamoto, Digital Fabrications: Architectural and Material Techniques. New York: Princeton Architectural Press, 2009

[5] Thomas Schröpfer, Material Design: Informing Architecture by Materiality. Basel: Birkhäuser GmbH, 2010.

[6] Material system describes “… the complex reciprocity between materiality, form, structure and space, the related processes of production and assembly and the multitude of performative effects that emanate from the interaction with environmental influences and forces” and is extensively researched by Michael Hensel, Achim Menges, and Michael Weinstock. Emergent Technologies and Design: Towards a Biological Paradigm for Architecture. Oxon, U.K. ; New York, NY: Routledge, 2010. P. 48

[7] Theorizing the new understanding of matter as possessing morphogenetic powers of its own through a revisited approach to causality, space and structure see Manuel DeLanda, “The New Materiality.” Architectural Design 85, no. 5 (September 1, 2015): 16–21. doi:10.1002/ad.1948.

[8] An example for the characterization of biological materials can be found in the work of Marc Meyers, for example in: Marc A. Meyers, and Po-Yu Chen. 2014. Biological Materials Science: Biological Materials, Bioinspired Materials, and Biomaterials. 1 edition. New York: Cambridge University Press.

[9] Catehrine Ingraham “Why all these birds? Birds in the sky, birds in the hand”, in Architecture and the Sciences: Exchanging Metaphors. Alessandra Ponte and Antoine Picon. 20031 edition. New York, N.Y. : Princeton, N.J: Princeton Architectural Press. P. 238

[10] Andrew Zolli, and Ann Marie Healy. Resilience: Why things bounce back. Simon and Schuster, 2012.

[11] Ibid 6, p.21

http://ift.tt/22Pvrwc

Flying Box Villa / 2A Design


© 2A Design / Josué Gillet

© 2A Design / Josué Gillet


© 2A Design / Josué Gillet


© 2A Design / Josué Gillet


© 2A Design / Josué Gillet


© 2A Design / Josué Gillet


© 2A Design / Josué Gillet

© 2A Design / Josué Gillet

Plan

Plan

2A Design has recently completed a surprising small and low cost house on a tiny plot, in a rural village next to Rennes (France). 

How to fit such a program on a so small parcel of land located 1.50m above the street ? How could we reduce the cost and the building period of the project?
The budget of this construction is as small as the building plot ! The program is as complex as the configuration of the parcel !


© 2A Design / Josué Gillet

© 2A Design / Josué Gillet

Diagram

Diagram

In order to give the best response to the client, 2A Design chooses to built this house with shipping containers (B3 Ecodesign concept). The house has been prefabricated in a factory then moved on the site and achieved in approximately three months.  The container dimensions fits exactly with the buildable zone of the plot !

The project is sliced in 3 levels. Each level is a 100sqm area. The superpostion of those different sequencies shape the house. Now we are able on this little plot to organize a complete program of the desired urban villa.


© 2A Design / Josué Gillet

© 2A Design / Josué Gillet

The first level, the ground one , is more technical : one parking zone for two cars, the covered entrance and the technical rooms; a sewing studio and a laundry.

The shared life stand on the first level, the garden one. We can find there a comfortable living room, the main room of the house.
The main volume of the house presents two glass facades.   The first face is above the street. The house take part in the life of the street. The other face, looking at the small garden, is completely transparent too.


Section

Section

Diagram

Diagram

Diagram

Diagram

By its small dimensions, the garden look like a patio, a private room without ceilling, open to the sky. We are there hided from the wind and the views from the neighborhood. You can then enjoy the patio for a comfortable chilling session! The last level, is another intimate space. The parental room is widely openened on a large roof terrasse. This space is a kind of solarium, maybe the most qualitative place of the house. From there, you can enjoy a view from the village to the natural landscape of the country. Giving back the roof of the villa to its inhabitants is the only way to propose large outdoor spaces on a so small plot. The terrasse is althoug planted with trees. We forget then that the house doesn’t have a real garden.


© 2A Design / Josué Gillet

© 2A Design / Josué Gillet

http://ift.tt/22Po4EZ

Gallery: Frank Lloyd Wright’s Solomon R. Guggenheim Museum by Laurian Ghinitoiu


© Laurian Ghinitoiu

© Laurian Ghinitoiu

The Solomon R. Guggenheim Museum, which opened in 1959, was controversial for being “less a museum than it is a monument to Frank Lloyd Wright.” Although Wright intended to display paintings on the curved interior walls of the central open space, the concave walls made it unworkable. Instead, the central atrium became a place for procession and the uncovering of space through movement. The continuous ramp overlooking the atrium allows people to interact from different levels.

Photographer Laurian Ghinitoiu places people at the core of his photography which perhaps explains how, in this photoset of the Guggenheim Museum to mark Wright’s 149th birthday, he captured the essence and vitality of the Guggenheim Museum. While some images depict the museum’s atrium as a place for passing-by, wandering or socializing, others grasp the growing influence of photography and self-representation on visitors’ experience. Some shots also show the building in its urban context with people involved in daily life activities.


© Laurian Ghinitoiu


© Laurian Ghinitoiu


© Laurian Ghinitoiu


© Laurian Ghinitoiu


© Laurian Ghinitoiu

© Laurian Ghinitoiu

© Laurian Ghinitoiu

© Laurian Ghinitoiu

© Laurian Ghinitoiu

© Laurian Ghinitoiu

© Laurian Ghinitoiu

© Laurian Ghinitoiu

© Laurian Ghinitoiu

© Laurian Ghinitoiu

© Laurian Ghinitoiu

© Laurian Ghinitoiu

© Laurian Ghinitoiu

© Laurian Ghinitoiu

© Laurian Ghinitoiu

© Laurian Ghinitoiu

© Laurian Ghinitoiu

© Laurian Ghinitoiu

http://ift.tt/1U7ooeO

Cumbaya House / Diego Guayasamin Arquitectos


© Sebastián Crespo

© Sebastián Crespo


© Sebastián Crespo


© Sebastián Crespo


© Sebastián Crespo


© Sebastián Crespo

  • Area Of Lot: 2.500 m2
  • Floors: 1 basement and 2 high floors

© Sebastián Crespo

© Sebastián Crespo

The residence is located in Cumbayá – Ecuador, in a lot of 2,500 m2. the location of the residence has been conceived as a continuous environment without barriers and open to the public space. The proposal withdraws generating a large green area as a contribution to the environment.


© Sebastián Crespo

© Sebastián Crespo

As image the house is an architectural, protagonist and dynamic volume. The articulation of three white volumes with a very clear and definite rhythm. It is a modern project that subtly rescues elements of traditional Ecuadorian architecture such as: walls – bearing walls, large presence of walls – paintings versus holes for withdraws windows to create effects of light and shade, among others.


© Sebastián Crespo

© Sebastián Crespo

Sensuously, the extension of the two front volumes generate a hug of welcome to visitors because of its spatial configuration, on this meeting point (pivot) is where the entrance to the house occurs. The location  in the lot divides the outer area into two distinct uses: an open – continuous highlighting the architecture from the public and other closed – private , where daily life unfolds. One of the main challenges was to respect the existing vegetation on the ground.


Section

Section

The house is divided into three levels: a sub – floor where the gym, parking lots and warehouses with housing service, which can operate independently are located. A main floor where most components of the assembly and a high plant where a private study develops.


Section

Section

The main floor has been divided into four zones: at the first end (more private) the master bedroom, connected through an art gallery into the living – dining room, next to which can find the kitchen area and complements and opposed to this, a playful and television space. Annex to the living room is the vertical axis of movement through an elevator. In the case of the second floor, the elevator is connected to the study through a glass bridge. The underground is connected with the ground floor through a large atrium that allows the entry of natural light trough the parking lots and other living room. This drilling has allowed to incorporate trees that cover the different levels of the house.


© Sebastián Crespo

© Sebastián Crespo

There is an additional recreational area, where a pool, green area, sauna and baths are located, also the bbq area.

Inside, the relation of openings and solids and the game of double height spaces enrich and give added value, this reflect that space is not only a surface built but the project is understood and perceived by volume.


© Sebastián Crespo

© Sebastián Crespo

Likewise can be define two different types of scales and sensations. A friendly for spaces private and other large format (double height) for the social areas. Complementing the architecture interior, have selected furniture that are proportionate to the space specific carpentry for project, furniture, decorative objects, fabrics and imported fabrics. Design specific lighting systems integrated audio and security, among others.


© Sebastián Crespo

© Sebastián Crespo

The project intention was always to make a different proposal, with a strong identity, and its own seal of design. Protagonist facades in balance and harmony; fluids and simple spaces; light, nature and serenity, are some of the qualities that we attribute to this project.

http://ift.tt/1Yemhc8

WATG’s Urban Architecture Studio Unveils Winning Design for a 3D Printed House


Courtesy of WATG

Courtesy of WATG

WATG’s Urban Architecture Studio has won First Prize in The Freeform Home Design Challenge, which challenged participants to “design the world’s first freeform 3D-printed residence.” The competition invited architects, designers, artists and engineers worldwide to investigate how 3D printing technologies can improve our built environment and lives today.


Courtesy of WATG

Courtesy of WATG

The challenge, commissioned by Branch Technology, was to design a 600-800 squarefoot single-family home that would push the boundaries of “traditional architectural aesthetics, ergonomics, construction, building systems, and structure from the ground up,” the press release states. 


Courtesy of WATG

Courtesy of WATG

The winning design consists of two central components: an interior core and exterior skin. The open-plan, light filled interior living spaces satisfy lighting requirements via passive solar design strategies, and connect occupants to the exterior spaces and nature itself. The ‘exterior skin’ comprises intricate archways, an organic structure harmonious with the surrounding environment.


Courtesy of WATG

Courtesy of WATG

According to Platt Boyd, Founder of Branch Technology, ‘Curve Appeal’ “responds well to the site conditions, magnifies the possibilities of cellular fabrication and pushes the envelope of what is possible, while still utilizing more economical methods for conventional building systems integration.”

The house is scheduled to begin planning phases at Branch Technology’s lab in Chattanooga, Tennessee, and is expected to begin 3D printing in 2017.

  • Architects: WATG
  • Location: Chattanooga, TN, United States of America
  • Architects In Charge: Daniel Caven, Miguel Alvarez, Brent Watanbe
  • Design Team: WATG
  • Area: 700.0 sqm
  • Project Year: 2016
  • Photographs: Courtesy of WATG

News via WATG

http://ift.tt/1Y8KgsT

Flexhouse / Evolution Design


© Peter Wuermli

© Peter Wuermli


© Peter Wuermli


© Peter Wuermli


© Peter Wuermli


© Peter Wuermli

  • Architects: Evolution Design
  • Location: Lake Zurich, Switzerland
  • Architect In Charge: Evolution Design
  • Design Team: Stefan Camenzind, Marco Noch, Patrick Uihlein, Mark Pinter, Silke Ebner, Vanessa Riecke
  • Area: 173.0 sqm
  • Project Year: 2016
  • Photographs: Peter Wuermli

© Peter Wuermli

© Peter Wuermli

Site plan

Site plan

From the architect. With its wide walls of glass and a ribbon-like white façade that winds its way around the building, this home on the banks of Lake Zurich is so light and mobile in appearance that it resembles a futuristic vessel that has sailed in from the lake and found itself a natural place to dock.

Called Flexhouse and completed in March 2016 by Swiss architecture and design studio Evolution Design, the four storey, 173 sq metre home has an open plan living, dining and kitchen space on the ground floor, two bedrooms and bathrooms on the first floor, a studio with two large terraces on the second floor and a basement level with underground garage and utility space. But it is the striking exterior architecture and the breathtaking 180degree views across Lake Zurich to the mountains beyond that really capture the imagination.


© Peter Wuermli

© Peter Wuermli

Entrance Level

Entrance Level

Architecture in motion

The project began when Evolution Design executive director Stefan Camenzind spotted a vacant block of land. The plot was well positioned on the banks of Lake Zurich but was a challenging site, triangular in shape, narrow and squeezed between a railway line and a road. Camenzind, though, saw potential in the position.


Long Section

Long Section

‘It’s a very transient plot; it has a lot of movement. The land is at the edge of the village where housing meets the countryside. The railway lines behind the plot are a dynamic yet soothing boundary, and in front of the house there is a local access road and the lake. We wanted to create a building that reflected all that movement,’ he says.

Swiss building regulations are notoriously tight and building on this block was particularly challenging. Camenzind explains: ‘There are strict rules around boundary distance and building volume, which means it’s quite difficult to be creative with buildings in Switzerland. But we were determined to build something that responded to the site rather than just a square box planted on the plot.’


© Peter Wuermli

© Peter Wuermli

Flexhouse is anything but a square box. The design features a floor plan that goes from wide to narrow to follow the railway lines and shape of the plot. The striking façade wraps around the building, drawing the eye continuously upward: the house never feels stiff or still, there are always elements drawing your eye throughout the space and to the views beyond.

‘We’ve given the space a direction of view. When you’re travelling in a car or train, you face a certain way and this house does too. On the ground floor it faces south-east, from the bedroom it faces west towards the sunset. And from the top floor terraces there are views around 180degrees,’ says Camenzind.


© Peter Wuermli

© Peter Wuermli

Inside out

The fluidity of the design continues inside, thanks to an open plan interior, unbroken views and reams of natural light, which streams throughout the space all day long. On the ground floor, the spacious living room transitions into a dining area and loft-style kitchen. Rather than close off individual floors, the design incorporates a double height open space that allows the eyes to travel, delivering a glimpse of the bedrooms above or, from the first floor, to the living room below.

With glass walls on three sides this home blurs the boundaries between outside and in. ‘Connecting inside and out is very important to me as an architect,’ says Camenzind. ‘I want people to know where they are when they are inside a building.’


© Peter Wuermli

© Peter Wuermli

The top floor studio with its panoramic views and two roof terraces is the culmination of this seamless flow between inside and out.

The house does have its quiet corners, too. ‘There’s always a back wall, which helps give a more cosy feeling,’ Camenzind says. ‘And you can close the blinds to create a peaceful, private corner.’


© Peter Wuermli

© Peter Wuermli

Practical considerations

Despite its model good looks, the house has been designed for everyday living and practical and ecological elements are integrated into the design. The rear wall of the living room functions as a storage and display space; the kitchen grows out of the same wall and in the bedrooms the wall functions as a screen, to separate the bathrooms from the sleeping spaces. Ecologically, the house meets Switzerland’s Minergie standard with features including thermally activated concrete floors that connect to a geothermal heat pump to heat the house in winter and cool it in summer. The glass façades are triple glazed and have external blinds for optimal control of heat gain from the sun.


© Peter Wuermli

© Peter Wuermli

Thus, Flexhouse with its innovative and ecological approach adds an extraordinary architectural touch on picturesque Lake Zurich and provides a truly special kind of eye-catcher.

http://ift.tt/1rcFsWm

Architecture as a Means of Synthesis – Monocle Reports from 2016 Venice Biennale

“Scrutinizing the horizon and looking for a new perspective” is what Alejandro Aravena has encouraged in the 2016 Venice Biennale, Reporting From the Front. “[He] has staged one of the most socially charged Biennales,” Gillian Dobias reports, by “exploring the different ways that design can add value.” In this, the first of two film reportages from the Biennale, Monocle talks to Aravena about his hopes for stimulating the debate on improving quality of life in the built environment, and tour the Central Pavilion and the Arsenale to uncover what’s on show.


Both the opening rooms of Biennale Architettura 2016 – at the Central Pavilion at Giardini and at Arsenale - were built with the 100 tons of waste material generated by the dismantling of the previous Art Biennale: 10,000m2 of gypsum board, 14km of metal studs. Image © Andrea Avezzù

Both the opening rooms of Biennale Architettura 2016 – at the Central Pavilion at Giardini and at Arsenale – were built with the 100 tons of waste material generated by the dismantling of the previous Art Biennale: 10,000m2 of gypsum board, 14km of metal studs. Image © Andrea Avezzù

Find out more about Monocle Films, here. See all of ArchDaily’s coverage of the 2016 Venice Biennale, here.

http://ift.tt/1TV0eSu