The Norwegian government has offered to abandon plans for a memorial to the 77 people murdered during the terrorist attacks of 22 July 2011, after fierce opposition by local residents. (more…)
As you enter Zion National Park from the east, Mt. Carmel Highway offers spectacular views and ever changing landscapes as you zig-zag your way down into the park’s canyon. Ian Barin captured this pic from above the winding road at sunset this past June. Photo courtesy of Ian Barin.
(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});
We all want to be extraordinary.
Sadly, most of us struggle to believe it’s even possible. We stare at those singers, athletes and entertainers on TV and see them as people we can never be. We think they’re cut from a different cloth.
The truth, however, is that knowing how to be extraordinary is only a part of the equation. To be one, you must work hard to have that strong will power to stand above the rest.
Here are a few insights to help you out
(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});
When superstars perform on the grand stage, we only see the finished product.
We don’t see the hours they spend repeating the same routines or the months of practice they had just to improve their acts. We don’t see their failures, embarrassments and rejections.
While ordinary people balk under these pressures, extraordinary people struggle on. They continue to practice way past the point where it’s enjoyable. They sacrifice so many of life’s pleasures and train to the point of exhaustion.
Despite these things, they still turn up every day- even when they’re tired and frustrated. They continue to work hard even if their minds and bodies convince them to stop.
That’s the type of discipline and dedication extraordinary people have that separates them from the rest. That’s how to be extraordinary.
See Also: How To Be The Hero Of Your Own Story
(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});
As humans, it’s relatively easy for us to find a million excuses to slack off. This can make it difficult for us to make the changes we aspire to have.
These three tricks can show you how to easily achieve the right mindset.
Motive
The easiest way to cultivate endless motivation is to find your ulterior motive, which is your purpose in life. Once you are able to know your purpose, you’ll feel a motivating force that’s stronger than any other force you’ve felt. With this newly found passion, no excuse can slow you down.
(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});
Momentum
The fastest way to ‘turn pro’ is to practice your passion every single day. Once you feel motivated, your mind will experience this strong momentum where your body starts to feel the hustle and your brain starts learning faster.
Persevering becomes easy. Pushing yourself for improvement becomes autopilot. With this kind of momentum, each small step you take to becoming extraordinary appears effortless.
Maintenance
When you take care of your brain and body, staying motivated becomes easier. You can do this by doing both mental and physical exercises. Give it a rest by meditating and getting plenty of sleep. Make sure to nourish it with a healthy diet without any drugs or alcohol, too.
(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});
Once you start taking care of your mind and body the right way, you’ll witness how extraordinarily strong you’ll become.
See Also: 7 Easy Tips on How to Get the Perfect Nap
Talent is defined ‘as a natural aptitude or skill’ in the dictionary. That’s why I won’t describe any top celebrities as ‘talented’. To say that defies the decades of effort they put into perfecting their passion.
However, in my eyes, you can also be considered as extraordinary even if you haven’t reached those long years of mastering your craft.
(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});
Take for example those reality TV stars and social media sensations.
They’re not particularly skillful, but they’re still willing to put their full personalities in front of the public eye. They don’t pretend and they’re prepared to promote themselves hard. They’re willing to work tirelessly even when criticism rains down on them from all corners.
They hustle harder than any other person and that, in itself, is extraordinary.
Whether we choose to be a writer, social worker or shark whisperer, we all have the potential to stand out and make a difference. We just have to know how to be extraordinary and choose to be one.
(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});
We must decide to step where others won’t dare to tread and plow forward even when things get painful. To put it simply, it’s just like fulfilling your own prophecy.
(function(d) {
var params =
{
id: “cb4f919c-04fa-460c-b2ff-2c7f9ecf4472”,
d: “ZHVtYmxpdHRsZW1hbi5jb20=”,
wid: “165294”,
cb: (new Date()).getTime()
};
var qs=[];
for(var key in params) qs.push(key+’=’+encodeURIComponent(params[key]));
var s = d.createElement(‘script’);s.type=’text/javascript’;s.async=true;
var p = ‘https:’ == document.location.protocol ? ‘https’ : ‘http’;
s.src = p + “://api.content.ad/Scripts/widget2.aspx?” + qs.join(‘&’);
d.getElementById(“contentad165294”).appendChild(s);
})(document);
(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});
The post How To Be Extraordinary In Any Walk Of Life appeared first on Dumb Little Man.
A century since the founding of the National Memorial Association and the start of a campaign by African-American war veterans for a monument of African American culture, the National Museum of African American History and Culture will finally be opened on September 24th. The Museum took $540 million and four years to build, resulting in a striking, and refreshingly unorthodox, architectural construction on Washington DC’s National Mall. The Freelon Adjaye Bond/SmithGroup JJR team, led by Ghanaian-British architect David Adjaye, defiantly broke the white-marble-Corinthian-column convention, opting instead for a bronze-coated aluminum façade bound to provoke a reaction from the critics.
“The most impressive and ambitious public building to go up in Washington in a generation” – Christopher Hawthorne, LA Times
Hawthorne celebrates the building’s architectural character and beauty of the façade’s “shifting personality” in different qualities of light. However his praise for the NMAAHC does not stop at the building’s aesthetics. Hawthorne highlights the museum’s bold mission to, on one hand, provide a beautiful design, while on the other uplifting the African American culture on a site dominated by white monuments:
The museum’s skin — has that typically benign architectural term ever been more charged? — allows it to stand apart from the Mall’s white-marble monuments like a rebuke.
Due to the history of the museum, the site and the nation in which it is built, the political and cultural prominence of the NMAAHC is hard to ignore. Hawthorne acknowledges Adjaye’s vision to use this to the building’s full advantage, while at the same time applauding the architects’ respect for the museum’s context:
The building itself is perhaps the most powerful display of all, a careful, strategic and sometimes defiant exploration of the relationship between black culture and government prerogative, which is another way of saying it is a piece of architecture supple enough to please the archivist and the activist alike.
Half of the building has been “buried” underground, as a result of Washington’s height regulations. Not only does this produce a neat design above-ground, but also helps to communicate the progression of African American history:
The NMAAHC is undeniably an imposing architectural object, monumental and temple-like. Yet it also suggests something that has been unearthed, a box pulled from the ground and dusted off; much of its 420,000 square feet of interior space is buried below street level.
“Although credited as lead designer, Adjaye is one of four architecture practices responsible for the project, a cocktail of divided responsibilities that feels like too many cooks.” – Oliver Wainwright, The Guardian
Wainwright is the only critic to point out the difficulties that can arise from having many voices involved in the design process. Clearly, he attributes some of the museum’s limitations to these circumstances, providing an explanation for some critics, who have been disappointed by the comparison of the building with original visualizations:
The whole project, then, was co-ordinated in the cloud, using BIM modelling software, and there are moments where you sense the left hand might not have quite understood the right hand’s intentions, areas that appear to have slipped through the contractual cracks.
Although Wainwright, like Hawthorne, pays tribute to the museum’s success in holding its own on such a sensitive site, he goes on to comment on what he sees as several architectural shortcomings of the NMAAHC. These include the bronze coated aluminum façade, initially intended to be fully cast in bronze, as well as the intention to have much larger surfaces of the perforated metal, which have instead been replaced by smaller repeated elements:
These choices don’t ruin the effect, but they lend the building a slight cheapness – a feeling that gets more pronounced when you step inside.
Some of these drawbacks resulted from lack of funding, as well as structural difficulties. Wainwright recalls the architects’ original design proposals, expressing a clear disappointment in the materialized result:
The circulation areas, housed in the gap between the outer facade and the gallery levels within, promised to be a dramatic sequence up escalators and along cantilevered landings, veiled by the lacy mesh. The result feels half-baked. From the inside, the cumbersome steel structure needed to hold up the facade takes up most of the view, while the impact of specially framed vistas to nearby monuments is lessened by clunky fixings.
However, on the whole Wainwright concludes that the building, while not perfect, works adequately in its setting:
Despite some clunks, the result has a compelling, spiky otherness, standing on the Mall as a welcome rebuke to the world of white marble monuments to dead white men.
“As a freestanding largely symmetrical object, the new museum has something in common with its neighbors, but as a dark-clad structure that eschews classical columns for apparently floating horizontal layers, it does not.” – Rowan Moore, The Guardian
None of the critics can avoid discussing the building’s intricate relation to its site, and Moore is no exception. His review of the NMAAHC is very much in line with that of Wainwright’s, remarking on the dissonance between the original renderings and the aluminium reality:
It is not flawless, as it sometimes feels assembled or panellized more than crafted. The bronze-colored screens are not the delicate, seamless things suggested in computer visualizations. The build-up of the exterior cladding – glass wall plus screen plus substantial fixings for the latter – impedes the sense of connection between inside and out.
Despite this, Moore focuses on the building’s conceptual vision and achievements. In accordance with the other critics, he emphasizes the building’s strength that lies in its complexity. Due to the intricate nature of the NMAAHC, certain imperfections can be hard to avoid, but on the whole the architectural novelty hits the mark:
There are moments of gawkiness that can be engaging or uncomfortable, depending on your taste. But it achieves its main, difficult task, which is to be both American and African American, and to be of its location but also different from it.
“Architecture and identity rarely fuse as convincingly as they do here.” – Justin Davidson, NY Mag
Davidson, like many of the other critics, comments on the division between the museum above and below ground, going into more detail about its successful role in serving the African-American story the museum wants to tell:
Visitors enter a broad, open lobby that serves as the museum’s midpoint, both overture and interlude between the historical journey below and the celebratory galleries above.
However in contrast to his fellow critics, Davidson seems to take no issue with the compromised bronze structure, strongly endorsing the aluminum façade which he calls “the most seductive aspect” of the building’s design:
Its dark bronzed skin broods in the glare of morning, glows in the late afternoon sun, and at all times contrasts with the marble-white uniformity of Washington’s official architecture. You could hardly ask for a more literal, or more effective, architectural assertion of a building’s mission.
The bronzed panelled canopy is an extrapolation of railing designs wrought by slaves, reflected and rotated to create a pattern covering the building. Davidson notes not only the beauty and practicality of the structure, but also its symbolic relevance that seems to orbit the not yet opened, yet already historic, monument:
Standing on an indoor balcony, we look out at the capital campus through a clarifying scrim. Adjaye has reframed the nation’s preeminent icon as an object behind glass — an ambiguous symbol best comprehended in the context of black America’s story.
The seat of the advertising and movie sound production company is a remarkable place, the place in which the paths of many different people: actors, lectors, clients and team employees intermingle. The same way, there intermingle the paths of sound and images in audio and sound montage rooms. There is a lot going on here. All that jazz needs to be restrained and arranged – divided and separated, so that both work and breaks between the recordings provide necessary relaxation.
In our design we put forward a new, logical and functional division of space dedicated either for work and casual meetings.
Our primary design task was to create an arranged, representative entrance – a spacious common area. The company seat is located in a terraced house from the 80’s, rather dimly lit and with undersized interiors.
The ground floor space, where a receptionist welcomes the visitors, was completely redesigned. There is a coatroom and a room with a large table designed for meetings with a large number of participants. We also prepared separate rooms for the administration and accounting as well as some quiet nooks for casual meetings. And, of course, a lavatory.
The design needed to be economical since the building is only rented.
The real challenge here was a tough deadline imposed by the investor – a holiday period. The assumption was not to interfere with the large amount of tasks which the company employees have to complete during the year. All tiers underwent renovation which included renovation of the staircase and development of new designs of the recording and sound editing studios. However, the major part of the renovation related to the ground floor area.
Apart from the rearrangement of the areas and functions on the ground floor, our design included development of partition walls, which is a reference to the divider wall structures in 2b4 buildings. We teasingly didn’t fill them in with the acoustic insulation material that would absorb the noise. We left (and designed) structure framework and emphasized their aesthetics by filling them with semitransparent polycarbonate panels. Transverse divisions of the wooden structure form marvelous shelves for books, magazines and binders.
Thanks to this solution the interiors became more spacious. The activities performed in individual rooms are hardly seen, however, the light from the garden spreads throughout the whole ground floor.
All structures and furniture are made of varnished pine wood, the filling panels are made of semitransparent polycarbonate and the ground level floor is covered with grey rubber flooring. The walls were painted white and additionally we placed a mirror in the waiting room to make the room even more spacious. To complement the interior we used standard luminaires and simple and affordable furniture from a well-known megastore.
The Chicago Architecture Biennial (CAB) has announced that Sharon Johnston and Mark Lee, of the Los Angeles-based firm Johnston Marklee, have been named Artistic Directors for the 2017 event. Following a successful inaugural run in 2015, the second edition of the biennial will take place from September 16 – December 31, 2017.
Speaking exclusively to ArchDaily, Artistic Directors Sharon Johnston and Mark Lee said:
“We are thrilled with the invitation to be the Artistic Directors for the second edition of the largest exhibition of contemporary architecture in North America. To have a global platform to address current ideas and showcase the talent in the field of architecture in a city with such an extraordinary architectural pedigree is a once in a lifetime opportunity.”
Since 1998 the practice has worked on residential, commercial, and institutional work with a particular focus on the arts. They frequently collaborate with artists, visual designers and writers to, in their own words, “broaden the breadth of [their] design research” in order to maintain “permeable boundaries for greater results.”
The practice is jointly led by Sharon Johnston, a graduate of Stanford University, and Mark Lee, a graduate of the University of Southern California. Both have studied at the Harvard Graduate School of Design.
Also announced was the addition of Todd Palmer, formerly of the National Public Housing Museum, as the Biennial’s Executive Director. He will work alongside the CAB board to establish the Biennial as a “world-class cultural attraction for the city.”
Under the theme of “State of the Art of Architecture,” the inaugural Biennial was North America’s first and largest international exhibition dedicated to the display of contemporary architecture, featurings works from over 120 architecture and design offices from more than 30 countries. Over half a million people from all over the world attended the event.
“The Chicago Architecture Biennial’s return in 2017 confirms Chicago as an architectural hub,” said Chicago Mayor Rahm Emanuel. “Last year’s edition was a resounding success, and I’m pleased to see the great planning and support for the second Biennial, which will be even better. Not only is the Biennial’s return a testament to our city’s architectural significance, but it speaks to Chicago’s place as one of the world’s cultural destinations and our place in the world of architecture and design.”
News via Chicago Architecture Biennial.
Everybody fears something. Some people are scared by spiders, while others are terrified by failure. Fear exists in our lives, we cannot deny it.
Fear’s role is to help us survive as a species. It makes us avoid the potentially dangerous situations, maybe saving our life in the process.
Take now this quick quiz and find out what is your biggest fear!
//cdn.playbuzz.com/widget/feed.js
The post We Know Your Biggest Fear Based On The Images You Choose appeared first on Change your thoughts.
Los Angeles – California – USA (by Gilad Rom)
An emerging sector of construction is developing new systems that manage to not only reduce construction times and costs, but also solve the housing problem in Mexico’s most disadvantaged areas. Originating from previously known construction techniques, national companies are venturing into international markets by proposing new models of construction that use fewer materials and have a greater structural strength and greater comfort. They’re also introducing smart materials adaptable to any construction need.
As part of this new industry breakthrough, Juan Manuel Reyes from Armados Omega and architect Jorge Capistrán have developed a new, low-cost construction system which also reduces construction time by 50%. It uses single module blocks and doesn’t require binders, mixtures, or skilled labor.
Block ARMO, developed by Armed Omega, debuted in late 2015 in an official press release by the Mexican Council for Science and Technology, in which Juan Manuel Reyes said the company’s goal “is to provide new construction systems to further contribute to Mexican society meeting the demand for decent housing.”
The manufacturing process for the stone blocks uses production methods based on recycled materials and low water consumption. The team of developers is interested in releasing to the market a new system of self-building at different scales and for different needs.
According to Jorge Capistran, who patented the innovative system putting it into practice in 2009 for a project developed by the Ministry of Social Development (SEDESOL), he has built more than 300 homes in Sierra Negra, Puebla.
Juan Manuel Reyes explained that “the system consists of six pieces of self-assembly that are self-supporting. A metal rod is inserted every 80 centimeters, with no need for a special foundation, creating a structure where you can install pipes and wiring without any problems.”
The idea of this particular assembly, which is similar to a puzzle, is that extensive training or side building systems that complicate the assembly process or generate high building costs are no longer required.
“This construction method helps workers because they don’t need any extensive training to implement the system” said the director Juan Manuel Reyes.
With a manufacturing plant in Cholula, Puebla, the Mexican company continues to create new elements that diversify the product and function as decorative elements with various finishes, colors, and textures in the piece, with the hope of replacing traditional systems, reducing costs all while contributing significantly to the construction sector and housing in Mexico.
News via: Conacyt Prensa.
Sig Nordal 