This week we’re counting down the most-pinned brick interiors on Dezeen, including an auditorium in the Netherlands featuring vertical brickwork and a converted 1920s shophouse in Singapore (+ slideshow). (more…)
You’re reading How Long It Really Takes To Form a New Habit (and how to get started), originally posted on Pick the Brain | Motivation and Self Improvement. If you’re enjoying this, please visit our site for more inspirational articles.
21 days.
21 days and that’s all it takes to form any habit in the world. This is the most common piece of advice you’ll find about habits. It’s plastered all over popular psychology websites, self-improvement columns, and is even the premise for quite a few apps.
Seems easy enough. Just do anything for 21 days and magically it should stick. But let’s take a closer look…
Unfortunately, for anyone who’s actually tried to form a new habit, especially a more elusive one – like exercise for instance – 21 days isn’t the case.
I actually felt pretty down on myself after looking back and thinking,
“It took a heck of a long longer than 21 days for me to start exercising regularly. I must suck.”
Well thankfully, I wasn’t alone.
In 2009, a study was done in the European Journal of Social Psychology where each participant chose an eating, drinking, or other behavior to carry out daily following a unique cue. For example, one glass of water after breakfast. This activity was to be performed for 12 weeks.
The results? The average time it took for a behavior to become a habit was 66 days. But the real kicker was the range of the data. Some participants automated their behavior after just 18 days while others took up to 254 days!
At first, the data may seem disheartening. At second glance however, it strikes me as strangely comforting. It reminds us that habit, much like success, isn’t a one size fits all. How long it takes to form a new habit varies wildly, depending on:
Which makes sense. When starting from scratch, drinking one glass of water each day is obviously going to be easier than writing 1000 words daily. And someone who has already trained their willpower (yes, willpower can be trained) will have an easier time forming a habit than someone just starting to develop better habits.
Now for the good news…
Even though habits follow wildly different timelines to being formed, they all follow the same general framework to get there. So how does one stick to a habit when it could possibly take 254 days to become routine? Let’s dive in.
To start forming habits, it’s important to understand what makes them so hard to stick. It could be any one of the following reasons:
These are all valid reasons. It makes sense then that our plan for forming a new habit must address most, if not all, of these bad guys.
“If you fail to plan, you are planning to fail.” –Benjamin Franklin
Habits aren’t rocket science, but they are a skill. This means that the more you practice forming habits, the better you get at it. If you’re a newbie just starting to develop better habits, take my advice and start extremely small.
Just one glass of water every day is a perfectly easy way to build your habit skills, while also improving your health.
Telling your significant other how much you appreciate them is another perfect way to build your habit skills, while bolstering your relationships. It’s also incredibly effortless, but ridiculously powerful.
Remember, whichever habit you choose to work on, don’t get discouraged if it hasn’t become automatic after 21 days. Science is on your side as long as you’re consistent and follow the advice in this article.
Jason Gutierrez writes at themonklife.net about behavioral science and how to create better habits to drastically improve your life. Sign up for his free newsletter to get practical advice for becoming a superhero version of yourself.
You’ve read How Long It Really Takes To Form a New Habit (and how to get started), originally posted on Pick the Brain | Motivation and Self Improvement. If you’ve enjoyed this, please visit our site for more inspirational articles.
London Design Festival 2016: French designer Mathieu Lehanneur has convincingly sculpted blocks of black marble to look like the sea for an installation at the V&A museum. (more…)
The Chicago Athenaeum Museum of Architecture and Design and the European Centre for Architecture, Art, Design and Urban Studies have named LAVA (Laboratory for Visionary Architecture) as the recipients of their 2016 European Prize for Architecture.
One of Europe’s most prestigious architecture awards, The European Prize for Architecture is given annually to architects who have ‘blazoned a new path and direction for an architecture that is deeply humane and committed to forward the principles of European humanism’.
“LAVA successfully uses imagination and intellect combined with social forces and the latest building technologies as both theme and apparatus of their designs, creating a body of work that explores and expresses architecture as a risk-taking, visceral experience,” said Chicago Athenaeum president Christian Narkiewicz-Laine.
“In the process, we come to experience architecture anew: from how it is imagined to how it is drawn, to the challenges and dynamics that define forward-thinking about time, place, and the environment, and how buildings and urban ideas become constructed and take shape as part of a collective public experience.”
Founded by Chris Bosse, Alexander Rieck and Tobias Wallisser, LAVA operates as an international think tank with offices in Berlin, Stuttgart, and Sydney. Recent completed projects include the Philips company headquarters in Eindhoven, a terrace house renovation and an airport retail fit out in Sydney, as well as a university master plan Riyadh, a youth sports hostel in Bayreuth, mixed use projects in Berlin and Hangzhou, and villas in HCMC currently under construction.
“We are very pleased to be recognised as architects who are not only interested in the production of square metres but interested in the broader development of the discipline, constantly trying to shift boundaries and to redefine what architecture can achieve today. How can we create spaces suitable for contemporary lifestyles and how can we contribute towards an environment that offers quality for everyone?” commented LAVA Director Tobias Wallisser.
A formal ceremony presenting the award will be held in Athens, Greece on September 23rd, 2016. Last year prize was awarded to Santiago Calatrava, with previous awards going to Italian architect Alessandro Mendini in 2014, Finnish architect Marco Casagrande in 2013, TYIN tegnestue Architects in 2012, Graft Architekten in 2011 and Bjarke Ingels in 2010.
Check out the gallery below to see some of LAVA’s work.
News via The European Centre for Architecture Art Design and Urban Studies, LAVA.
From the architect. Do you know the architecture of Chiapas? A house with identity, adapted to its regional and bioclimatic context, always reflecting a constructive honesty in its elements and materials.
In a site 7.00×15.00 meters, with a single front facing east and surrounded by social housing; we design a house with few resources but with an intensive contextual and formal study.
The facade does not formally respond to any reading of commercial housing, because it is closed to the outside through small openings on the ground floor and large lattice walls surrounding the terraces of each bedroom. A base of exposed concrete confines the ground floor, while brick walls generate the upstairs envelope. The 143.00 m2 of interiors are distributed among the living, dining room, kitchen, bathroom, laundry room, terrace and vertical core; on the ground floor.
The upper level houses two bedrooms with dressing room, a bathroom and the master bedroom with bathroom and dressing room. One of the main studies of this house was the natural light, which maximizes the openings in bathrooms, the vertical circulation and the double height dining room, from which the silhouettes of brick vaults are projected on a canvas of exposed polished concrete.
The constant circulation of winds is used in social areas and corridors of the house due to the openings at each end and domes allowing the circulation of hot air. Inside the house there are a couple of gardens, one divides the living and dining areas and the other covers the void produced by the stairs.
In developing a proposal with a contextual character, we keep a close relationship with the materials and techniques of the region, this means that the material and human resources should not impact the expenditure of energy and therefore the economic resource
The project concept is based on the study of the context, so that both the site and its resources were the guiding principles of the proposal thus generating a character and identity that the state of Chiapas has lost with the need for housing and their promoters. The brick walls and exposed concrete throughout the ground floor as a structural base solution were the references that provide identity and remembrance of the construction processes of yesteryear in the locality.
This house with regional character represents a constructive honesty not only outside, but also inside. The base made of exposed concrete walls on the ground floor demonstrates both structural and visual stability. The synergy between brick and concrete clearly identifies the context in which this property is developed.
The technique of leaving the concrete and brick exposed displays the development and design of their structures. An example is the brick vaults resting on IPR double height beams, supported by an exposed concrete wall. To devise a double height area in such a small property represented a challenge for the project and also a satisfaction as we were not forced to sacrifice other spaces.
Do you ever feel like you have to leave work to get any actual work done? Between interruptions, meetings and distractions, sometimes the office seems like the least productive place on earth. You’re not the only one who feels this way: Many employees say they get more done when working outside than inside the office. Is sending them home or to Starbucks the only way to make your employees more productive?
Not necessarily. A recent study by Oxford Economics reports that, although employees want to be productive at work, open-plan offices, constant conductivity and technology hiccups are all standing in the way. But there are solutions. Here’s a closer look.
When asked what attributes are most important in the work environment, being able to focus at work without interruptions ranked number one. In fact, employees care more about being able to concentrate than having their own offices, subsidized child care or free food at work. In other words, as the survey puts it, it’s not about “beanbag chairs and free burritos.”
What’s hampering productivity? The study found three key elements:
Open-plan offices fit well with today’s emphasis on collaborative work, and being able to collaborate is one thing that employees value. However, open spaces can be noisy, especially if workers are squeezed close together as they may be if a small business is trying to save on space. In addition to distracting workers, noise can make talking on the phone to customers or clients more difficult as people on both ends of the call strain to hear. Filtering out background noise is mentally tiring, sapping employees’ productivity. Somewhat surprisingly, Millennial employees are more likely than other age groups to be distracted by noise, and find it more annoying than other demographics.
Solution: Take steps to minimize noise. Carpeting hard floors or putting down rugs will help absorb noise, as will window coverings, plants, sound-absorbing ceiling tiles and even wall decor. Basically, the more hard surfaces in your location, the noisier it will be; adding softer elements will bring the noise level down. Also be sure you provide quiet spaces where employees can hold meetings without disrupting others. Employees who need to be on the phone constantly, such as sales reps or customer service staff, should be concentrated in a space away from others who need quiet. Noise-canceling headphones, white noise machines or smartphone apps, and even earplugs can help, too.
While technology has made our jobs a lot easier in some ways, the study finds it’s still got a long way to go. Just 38 percent of employees in the survey say they have all the tools they need to do their jobs, and only 36 percent say the devices they use when away from the office work seamlessly with workplace technology. This adds to frustration over distractions: Employees may try to get work done in a coffee shop or at home because the office is too noisy, but find that they lack the tools to work effectively anywhere else.
Solution: Make sure your employees have the proper tech tools they need to get their jobs done wherever they are. If your employees work remotely, for example, or travel frequently on business, provide them with technology to use on the go. If employees prefer to use their own devices, as many do, try to find apps that work with multiple platforms or with the platforms that most employees use. This will help ensure that the devices your team uses in the office, at home and on the road all integrate smoothly, meaning greater productivity.
Constant connection via devices and technology is another factor contributing to distraction. Higher-level employees are more likely to feel the pressure to be constantly “on.” Collaboration technologies that indicate when people are on a social network or chat app can contribute to the belief that people are always available to be interrupted. There’s also a gap between expectations and reality: While only one-fourth of executives say they frequently expect employees to be available after hours, nearly half of employees think their supervisors expect this kind of responsiveness. More than one-third of respondents in the survey say they feel compelled to check their devices frequently due to social pressure and fear of missing something.
Solution: Set limits on connectivity. Try actually getting up and talking to each other instead of conducting every communication via electronic device. Make sure employees know what is and isn’t expected of them regarding responsiveness. If you don’t expect your team to respond to your emails on weekends, tell them so! That may be the only time you can get around to sifting through your emails, but they may feel pressure to respond. Some companies try email-free days or eliminate emails on Friday afternoon; others set rules such as no emails before 7 a.m. or after 8 p.m. See what works for you and your employees.
The bottom line in improving productivity by eliminating distractions: It’s all about clearly communicating with your team regarding their needs, your expectations and how the two can meet.
The post 3 Simple Ways to Turbocharge Employee Productivity appeared first on AllBusiness.com
The post 3 Simple Ways to Turbocharge Employee Productivity appeared first on AllBusiness.com. Click for more information about Rieva Lesonsky.
“The annals say: when the monks of Clonmacnoise / Were all at prayers inside the oratory / A ship appeared above them in the air. / The anchor dragged along behind so deep / It hooked itself into the altar rails.”[1]
These words by Irish poet Seamus Heaney had a profound impact on the work of architects Sheila O’Donnell and John Tuomey, who cited the poem as their inspiration for the Glucksman Gallery – a space commissioned by the University of Cork. Named for its patron Lewis Glucksman (a Wall Street trader and philanthropist), the Glucksman Gallery was completed in 2005 and nominated for a Stirling Prize that same year. Thanks to its outstanding site-specific design, the building has since become one of the most celebrated works of modern architecture in Ireland.
Located at the gateway to the university campus, adjacent to a limestone escarpment in an ornamental garden on the bank of the River Lee, the brief required a building that would be sensitive to its green surroundings. Indeed, previous proposals for development had been rejected due to environmental concerns. O’Donnell + Tuomey’s solution was a vertically-orientated building with a small footprint to minimize disruption to the natural landscape. They assured the President of the university, Gerry Wrixon, that the footprint of the building would be restricted to the area of the two existing tennis courts on the site, and that they would not cut down so much as a single tree.[2]
The resulting building comprises three levels of open exhibition space which host temporary shows as well as providing as a home for the university’s permanent art collection. It also houses lecture facilities, a café, and a shop. At ground level, a limestone podium leads visitors to a glass lobby which provides access to the galleries. This podium also continues past the building to the river, connecting the campus path with a riverside walk to establish a physical link between the university and its environment. The podium, which the architects describe as “both landscape and building, plinth and pathway,”[3] recalls the architectural promenade of James Stirling’s Neue Staatsgalerie, a project which O’Donnell + Tuomey worked on before establishing their own practice.
Their time working under Stirling had a formative impact on their careers. Having met while studying at University College Dublin (where they both later became Professors), O’Donnell + Tuomey joined Stirling’s office shortly after qualifying. Despite leaving after just a few years to establish the architectural partnership O’Donnell + Tuomey (with great success – they were awarded the RIBA Gold Medal in 2015 and have been nominated for the Stirling Prize five times to-date), their work continues to embody ideas incubated in Stirling’s practice. They inherited, for example, his “passion for a richness of color, material and texture,”[4] qualities which continue to characterize their designs, not least that of the Glucksman Gallery.
Each of the building’s architectural components are differentiated through the use of contrasting materials. Nestled amongst the trees, the steel frames of the galleries are wrapped in Angelim de Campagna timber (a sustainably-sourced hardwood) to reflect the building’s natural context, while the window frames use galvanized steel to reduce the effects of weathering. The interlocking planes of the upper façade sit on a concrete platform which is raised above the ground on piloti. The platform features dramatic cantilevers twelve meters deep which, Tuomey explained, “allowed us to place the galleries close up against the trees without damaging their roots.”[5]
The concrete platform is composed of granite aggregate, sandblasted to reveal flecks of mica which allow it to glisten as it catches sunlight. The transparency of the glass lobby below helps to separate the mass of the galleries from the ground, thereby reducing the impact—both physically and conceptually—of the building to the landscape. The limestone podium, meanwhile, references both the geology of the site and the traditional limestone buildings of Cork.
The galleries feature large windows which draw the surroundings into the exhibition space, inviting visitors to reflect on the formal qualities of nature alongside the artworks on display. As Kenneth Frampton observed, “this space constantly compels one to shift and adjust one’s attention, ever divided between the stability of culture and the volatility of nature”.[6] Several of the windows are carefully aligned to frame specific views, namely the river, the university and the city. According to Tuomey, this was intended to place the viewer within a wider context: “you never forget that you are in the world no matter where you are.”[7]
As with the majority of their projects to date, O’Donnell + Tuomey have been content to allow the program of the Glucksman Gallery take precedence over its architecture, in keeping with their belief that “the event is what happens in the building, not the building itself.”[8] For instance, the expansive windows of the galleries flood the exhibition spaces with natural light – a pleasant spatial experience but one which poses challenges for both curators and conservators of art. Light-sensitive works could be easily damaged by the sun’s rays and the spaces are too bright to show film work. To solve this problem, O’Donnell + Tuomey created ‘close control’ galleries (so-called as their environmental conditions could be easily regulated) located in the core of the building. Enveloped by the larger galleries around the periphery of the building, the close control galleries are shielded from sunlight by the interior walls, allowing for a greater diversity of exhibition content.
The architects have repeatedly referred to the Glucksman Gallery as a “celestial vessel,” alluding to Heaney’s aforementioned poem. Tuomey described the imagery of the poem as a “direct visual reference for us in our idea of the building – a ship straining above a stone terrain.”[9] The parallels are clear: the smooth curve of the galleries’ timber cladding bears a strong resemblance to the hull of a ship, and the structure sits on a base of limestone. Another, perhaps more direct, source of inspiration came from a visit to an exhibition of a Viking ship in Dublin. The ship, suspended amongst the trees to allow visitors to walk beneath, was described by Tuomey as one of the most beautiful things he had ever seen.[10]
References
[1] Heaney, Seamus. “Lightenings viii”. Nobel Prize. Accessed 16 August, 2016. [access]
[2] O’Donnell, Sheila and John Tuomey. O’Donnell + Tuomey: Selected Works. New York: Princeton Architectural Press, 2007. p.160
[3] “Glucksman Gallery University College Cork”. O’Donnell + Tuomey. Accessed 16 August, 2016. [access]
[4] “The Story Behind the Architects”. RIBA. Accessed 17 August, 2016. [access]
[5] Ibid. Tuomey. p.58
[6] “Glucksman Gallery”. O’Donnell + Tuomey. Accessed 16 August, 2016. [access]
[7] Ibid.
[8] Lappin, Sarah A. Full Irish: New Architecture in Ireland. New York: Princeton Architectural Press, 2009. p.210
[9] Ibid. Tuomey. p.59
[10] O’Toole, Shane. “Seeing the bigger picture”. The Sunday Times. 27 March, 2005. p.18
[11] Tuomey, John. Architecture, Craft and Culture: Reflections of the work of O’Donnell + Tuomey. Kinsale: Gandon Editions, 2008. Craft, p.30
Imagine how small you might feel in the presence of a huge iceberg like this chunk from the McBride Glacier. At Glacier Bay National Park and Preserve – one of the 24 national park sites in Alaska – you can explore the Alaskan wilderness from sea to summit. True to its name, much of the park is water, meaning kayaks and boats are the main ways to see rugged mountains, dynamic glaciers and wild coastlines. Photo by Sean Neilson, National Park Service.
(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});
Before, men were expected to be gallant, knightly and perfect. Today, the meaning of manhood involves taking full responsibility for one’s actions and being brave enough to stand by his words. Men can now be as transparent as women in terms of their feelings, ideas and beliefs.
This is how the concept of manhood has changed throughout the years.
Traditionally, men went on hunts while women gathered berries and nurtured their children. They were dominant, strong and showed no signs of cowardice.
However, in today’s fast-paced world, men can forgo the traits of traditional masculinity without being seen as a coward. They can show sensitivity without losing their characters.
//<![CDATA[
aax_getad_mpb({
"slot_uuid":"16dcbcd0-2124-4a85-9abe-c263dd9084e5"
});
//]]>
One of the most common reasons for this is the rise of gender equality. With women gaining the same kind of power and earning the same level of respect, men no longer need to exert too much effort in proving themselves and asserting dominance and leadership.
Since there is no longer the need to assert gender superiority, men can show as much emotions as women. They can be sensitive, romantic and even be avoidant in some circumstances. Today, winning battles the smarter way has become every man’s mantra.
(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});
They can choose to back off, surrender, or even run away from difficult situations. They can remove themselves from certain circumstances without looking any less of a man.
This change in character, however, appears to be a double-edged sword. While it can improve his life, showing too much emotions and vulnerability can decrease men’s appeal to women.
See Also: The Truth About Why Men Aren’t Romantic Anymore
You don’t need to be violent in order to be considered as a man. Although the level of masculinity frequently shown in movies is astounding, being calm, humble and gentle are the characteristics people look for in men these days. Society has less tolerance now for grumpy and violent men.
Before, being able to have and raise more children were some of the signs of a true man. Sex was considered God’s gift and so men fulfilled His words of going forth to multiply. The more children a man has, the more manly he’s considered.
Today, men are respectful of their partners, especially in the field of parenting, bearing children, and sex. Having fewer children is no longer an issue, but having more children than what a man can afford to raise is still a strong concern. Being a “good provider” is an essential trait of today’s man.
With modern education available to men around the world, they are more receptive to women’s feelings and idealism. This improved capability of the modern men to listen and compromise is more appreciated over the insensitive and dominant characteristics of the primitive men.
Remember the old days when women became obsessed with competitions like the “Top Sexy Man of the Year”?
(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});
These competitions have set certain physical standards in men. Throughout the years, however, these standards became irrelevant. In addition to good looks, society now admires men who have big hearts for others and have outstanding intelligence, too. A true modern man comes in a complete package.
Aside from this transition, certain rites toward manhood slowly became less and less required as well. Circumcision and other rites to establish manhood are no longer strictly imposed in society before a man is allowed to fulfill his duties- physically, psychologically, spiritually, or even sexually.
See Also: 10 Ways to Be a Better Man (No you aren’t already doing them all)
Today’s meaning of manhood is still evolving, adapting, and coping to meet the present conditions. As the world becomes more equal for both genders, one should expect more changes in the role of men in the next coming years.
(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});
(function(d) {
var params =
{
id: “cb4f919c-04fa-460c-b2ff-2c7f9ecf4472”,
d: “ZHVtYmxpdHRsZW1hbi5jb20=”,
wid: “165294”,
cb: (new Date()).getTime()
};
var qs=[];
for(var key in params) qs.push(key+’=’+encodeURIComponent(params[key]));
var s = d.createElement(‘script’);s.type=’text/javascript’;s.async=true;
var p = ‘https:’ == document.location.protocol ? ‘https’ : ‘http’;
s.src = p + “://api.content.ad/Scripts/widget2.aspx?” + qs.join(‘&’);
d.getElementById(“contentad165294”).appendChild(s);
})(document);
The post The Change in the Meaning of Manhood Through Time appeared first on Dumb Little Man.
Nendo has taken its collection of chairs based on Japanese manga comics to New York, where they are on show as part of a light installation at Friedman Benda gallery (+ movie). (more…)
Sig Nordal 